NOW REBRANDED
Matkowsky Immigration Law is now Unified Immigration Lawyers. Same firm, same lawyers — new name.
Matkowsky Immigration Law is now Unified Immigration Lawyers. Same firm, same lawyers — new name.
A spousal sponsorship refusal was overturned after the tribunal accepted the couple’s evidence and rejected stereotyped assumptions about their cultural compatibility.
A visa officer refused permanent residence to the client’s husband, citing limited documentary evidence, a quick wedding, the couple meeting on Facebook and a 17-year age gap.
The couple explained that they were Tamil Hindus from the same village and shared the same cultural and religious background. They also described threats from the client’s former husband that caused most relatives to withdraw from the wedding.
At the appeal, the couple answered each concern directly and challenged the officer’s assumptions about what their community would consider compatible. Their testimony explained why the wedding had limited family attendance and showed the commitment required to continue the relationship.
The tribunal found the couple’s perseverance compelling evidence of a genuine relationship. The appeal was allowed, and the refusal was set aside.
A spousal sponsorship appeal succeeded after the tribunal assessed prior omissions in context and found that the marriage was genuine.
A spousal sponsorship appeal was allowed after the government discovered that the document said to be missing had been in its own file throughout the case.
A spousal sponsorship appeal succeeded on both the genuineness of the marriage and humanitarian relief from a misrepresentation finding.
Use this form to tell us what you are going through. We will carefully review the details of your situation and get back to you within one business day to schedule your strategy session.
"*" indicates required fields
