NOW REBRANDED
Matkowsky Immigration Law is now Unified Immigration Lawyers. Same firm, same lawyers — new name.
Matkowsky Immigration Law is now Unified Immigration Lawyers. Same firm, same lawyers — new name.
A sponsorship refusal based on compatibility concerns was overturned after both spouses gave consistent and credible testimony.
A visa officer refused the client’s husband based on concerns about the genuineness of the marriage, including an age gap and the client’s prior marriages.
Both spouses explained that they had been in contact since November 2011, met twice in person before marrying, and maintained communication throughout the relationship.
The appeal presented the couple’s relationship history through direct testimony from both spouses, allowing the tribunal and Minister’s counsel to assess the consistency of their evidence.
The testimony was so clear that the Minister’s counsel conceded the appeal at the end of the examination-in-chief. The tribunal found the refusal wrong in law and allowed the appeal.
A spousal sponsorship appeal succeeded after the tribunal assessed prior omissions in context and found that the marriage was genuine.
A spousal sponsorship appeal was allowed after the government discovered that the document said to be missing had been in its own file throughout the case.
A spousal sponsorship appeal succeeded on both the genuineness of the marriage and humanitarian relief from a misrepresentation finding.
Use this form to tell us what you are going through. We will carefully review the details of your situation and get back to you within one business day to schedule your strategy session.
"*" indicates required fields
